Hyparrhenia hirta_Steve Matson
Photo by Steve Matson

Hyparrhenia hirta Risk Assessment

Common names: Tambookie grass

Hyparrhenia hirta -- California

Primary tabs

Evaluation Summary
Summary: 
General Evaluation Information
Date of Evaluation: 
March 16, 2016
Evaluation Time (hrs): 
3 Hours
Evaluation Status: 
Completed
Plant Information
Plant Material: 
If the plant is a cultivar, and if the cultivar's behavior differs from its parent's (behavior), explain how: 
Regional Information
Region Name: 
Climate Matching Map
These maps were built using a toolkit created in collaboration between GreenInfo Network, PlantRight, Cal-IPC, and Agricultural Sustainability Institute at UC Davis.
Climate Matching Maps PDF: 
Invasive History and Climate Matching
1. Has the species (or cultivar or variety, if applicable; applies to subsequent "species" questions) become naturalized where it is not native?
Yes or No: 
Yes
Points: 
1
Confidence Level: 
Very High
Answer / Justification: 
California and Texas, widely naturalized in southern and eastern Australia. GBIF also shows locations in Western Australia and Central America. USDA ARS simply says naturalized without specifying where.
Reference(s): 
2. Is the species (or cultivar or variety) noted as being naturalized in the US or world in a similar climate?
Yes or No: 
Yes
Points: 
2
Confidence Level: 
Very High
Answer / Justification: 
Naturalized in two California counties. Some locations in Australia match California's climate. A weed of roadsides, disturbed sites, waste areas, higher quality pastures, grasslands, rangelands and open woodlands in temperate, sub-tropical and semi-arid regions.
Reference(s): 
3. Is the species (or cultivar or variety) noted as being invasive in the U.S. or world?
Yes or No: 
Yes
Points: 
2
Confidence Level: 
Very High
Answer / Justification: 
Listed as a noxious weed in South Australia, where it is required to be controlled. Also considered invasive in New South Wales, Queensland, Victoria, W. Australia. A weed of roadsides, disturbed sites, waste areas, higher quality pastures, grasslands, rangelands and open woodlands in temperate, sub-tropical and semi-arid regions.
Reference(s): 
4. Is the species (or cultivar or variety) noted as being invasive in the US or world in a similar climate?
Yes or No: 
Yes
Points: 
3
Confidence Level: 
Very High
Answer / Justification: 
Listed as a noxious weed in South Australia, where it is required to be controlled. Also considered invasive in New South Wales, Queensland, Victoria, W. Australia. A weed of roadsides, disturbed sites, waste areas, higher quality pastures, grasslands, rangelands and open woodlands in temperate, sub-tropical and semi-arid regions. Many locations in Australia match California. Spreading rapidly in southeastern Australia where it reduces the richness of native plants.
Reference(s): 
5. Are other species of the same genus (or closely related genera) invasive in a similar climate?
Yes or No: 
No
Points: 
0
Confidence Level: 
High
Answer / Justification: 
There are 15 other species listed in the Global Compendium of Weeds, mostly noted only as naturalized. Hyparrhenia rufa is the only other species with a number of citations. It is a problem in tropical South America, but this seems more tropical than California. Hyparrhenia rufa subsp. rufa is an environmental weed in Queensland and other parts of northern Australia but that does not match California's climate.
Reference(s): 
6. Is the species (or cultivar or variety) found predominately in a climate matching the region of concern?
Yes or No: 
Yes
Points: 
2
Confidence Level: 
High
Answer / Justification: 
H. hirta occurs in many locations around the Mediterranean that are similar to California, and also in southern Africa. The native range is mostly winter rainfall areas. GBIF map = http://www.gbif.org/species/2703243
Reference(s): 
Impact on Native Plants and Animals
7. Does this plant displace native plants and dominate (overtop or smother) the plant community in areas where it has established?
Yes or No: 
Yes
Points: 
1
Confidence Level: 
High
Answer / Justification: 
Spreading rapidly in southeastern Australia where it reduces the richness of native plants. Diversity and ground cover of native vascular plants are significantly reduced by heavy infestations of Hyparrhenia hirta.
Reference(s): 
8. Is the plant noted as promoting fire and/or changing fire regimes?
Yes or No: 
Yes
Points: 
1
Confidence Level: 
Medium
Answer / Justification: 
No mention of this specifically. However, the fact that it is called thatching grass implies that it could form a layer of thatch that might increase fuel loads. Increases after fire. This website mentions that the species germination and growth is stimulated by smoke, but does not cite where they derive this from. Given grasses flammability and structure it seems likely that it does have an impact on fire regimes and is likely to increase frequency and spread if it invades communities that formerly were not grass dominated.https://florabase.dpaw.wa.gov.au/browse/profile/452
Reference(s): 
9. Is the plant a health risk to humans or animals/fish? Has the species been noted as impacting grazing systems?
Yes or No: 
No
Points: 
0
Confidence Level: 
High
Answer / Justification: 
"Not favored by livestock but a useful feed if not allowed to seed." Was originally introduced as a forage grass.
Reference(s): 
10. Does the plant produce impenetrable thickets, blocking or slowing movement of animals, livestock, or humans?
Yes or No: 
No
Points: 
0
Confidence Level: 
Medium
Answer / Justification: 
Forms dense infestations. Can grow as tall as 1.5m. Since it's a grass, it's difficult to say if infestations are impenetrable (compared to a shrub of that same height).
Reference(s): 
Reproductive Strategies
11. Does this species (or cultivar or variety) reproduce and spread vegetatively?
Yes or No: 
No
Points: 
0
Confidence Level: 
High
Answer / Justification: 
Reproduces mainly by seed. The seed-heads are large leafy compound clusters (i.e. synflorescences) 15-40 cm or more long.
Reference(s): 
12. If naturally detached fragments from this plant are capable of producing new plants, is this a common method of reproduction for the plant?
Yes or No: 
Yes
Points: 
1
Confidence Level: 
Medium
Answer / Justification: 
Reproduces mainly by seed. Although this may not be a primary method of reproduction any rhizomatous grass that I am familiar with is able to reproduce from fragments, so this seems likely even if it rarely happens. - Tim Hyland
Reference(s): 
13. Does the species (or cultivar or variety) commonly produce viable seed?
Yes or No: 
Yes
Points: 
1
Confidence Level: 
Very High
Answer / Justification: 
Reproduces mainly by seed. The seed-heads are large leafy compound clusters (i.e. synflorescences) 15-40 cm or more long.
Reference(s): 
14. Does this plant produce copious viable seeds each year (> 1000)?
Yes or No: 
Points: 
Confidence Level: 
Very Low
Answer / Justification: 
Could not find information
Reference(s): 
15. Is there significant germination (>25%) of seeds the next growing season, with no requirement of an infrequent environmental condition for seeds to germinate (i.e. fire) or long dormancy period?
Yes or No: 
Yes
Points: 
1
Confidence Level: 
Medium
Answer / Justification: 
At least one website cited a study that showed that seeds from this species were able to germinate under a wide variety of PH, diurnal fluctuation and light regimes. There was no mention of dormancy. - Comment by Tim Hyland. (I do not have citation)
Reference(s): 
16. Does this plant produce viable seed within the first three years (for an herbaceous species) to five years (for a woody species) after germination?
Yes or No: 
Yes
Points: 
1
Confidence Level: 
Medium
Answer / Justification: 
Could not find information but a short juvenile period seems likely as it's a grass.
Reference(s): 
17. Does this plant continuously produce seed for >3 months each year or does seed production occur more than once a year?
Yes or No: 
Yes
Points: 
1
Confidence Level: 
Medium
Answer / Justification: 
Flowers March-July in California. In Australia, flowering occurs throughout the year, but mainly during summer.
Reference(s): 
Dispersal
18. Are the plant’s propagules frequently dispersed long distance (>100 m) by mammals or birds or via domestic animals?
Yes or No: 
Yes
Points: 
1
Confidence Level: 
Medium
Answer / Justification: 
Animals may disperse short distances (but no mention of longer dispersal).
Reference(s): 
19. Are the plant’s propagules frequently dispersed long distance (>100 m) by wind or water?
Yes or No: 
No
Points: 
0
Confidence Level: 
Medium
Answer / Justification: 
Can be spread short distances by wind, can float in water. Answering no because unsure how important these types of dispersal are.
Reference(s): 
20. Are the plant’s propagules frequently dispersed via contaminated seed (agriculture or wildflower packets), equipment, vehicles, boats or clothing/shoes?
Yes or No: 
Yes
Points: 
1
Confidence Level: 
High
Answer / Justification: 
Dispersed by vehicles, in mud, and in contaminated fodder. Spreads more rapidly along roads than away from roads, suggesting that seeds are being dispersed by vehicles (or the wind they generate) or road maintenance equipment.
Reference(s): 
Evaluation Notes
Total PRE Score

  • < 13 : accept (low risk of invasiveness)
  • 13 - 15 : evaluate further
  • > 15 : reject (high risk of invasiveness)

PRE Score: 
19
Number of questions answered: 
19
Screener Confidence (%): 
76.8
PRE Content Access and Privacy
Evaluation visibility: 
Public - accessible to all site users

Review this Evaluation

695

Click on the button below to mark this evaluation as "Reviewed". Once you click the button, please wait a second, and the site will return to this Evaluation and your name will be on the "Reviewers List" in the right hand column (below the Evaluation Summary). For more information, please see the help page on How to Review an Evaluation?

Vertical Tabs