Plant Assessment Form
More Zantedeschia aethiopica resources
Zantedeschia aethiopica
Common Names: calla lily; arum lily
Evaluated on: 7/31/03
List committee review date: 01/08/2003
Re-evaluation date:
Evaluator(s)
California Dept. of Parks and Recreation; CalEPPC
P. O. Box 603, Little River, CA 95456-0603
(707) 937-9172; (707) 937-2278
pwarner@mcn.org
List committee members
Jake SiggPeter Warner
Joe DiTomaso
Doug Johnson
Brianna Richardson
General Comments
No general comments for this species
Table 2. Criteria, Section, and Overall Scores
Overall Score?
Limited
|
Alert Status?
No Alert
|
Documentation?
2.5 out of 5
|
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | Documentation | |||
1.1 | ?Impact on abiotic ecosystem processes | U. Unknown | Reviewed Scientific Publication | |
1.2 | ?Impact on plant community | C. Minor | Observational | |
1.3 | ?Impact on higher trophic levels | U. Unknown | ||
1.4 | ?Impact on genetic integrity | D. None | Other Published Material | |
2.1 | ?Role of anthropogenic and natural disturbance in establishment | B. Moderate | Observational | |
2.2 | ?Local rate of spread with no management | B. Increases less rapidly | Observational | |
2.3 | ?Recent trend in total area infested within state | B. Increasing less rapidly | Observational | |
2.4 |
?Innate reproductive potential (see Worksheet A) |
A. High | Other Published Material | |
2.5 | ?Potential for human-caused dispersal | A. High | Other Published Material | |
2.6 | ? Potential for natural long-distance dispersal | B. Occasional | Other Published Material | |
2.7 | ?Other regions invaded | B. Invades 1 or 2 ecological types | Other Published Material | |
3.1 |
?Ecological amplitude/Range (see Worksheet C) |
B. Moderate | Observational | |
3.2 |
?Distribution/Peak frequency (see Worksheet C) |
D. Very low | Observational |
Table 3. Documentation
Scores are explained in the "Criteria for Categorizing Invasive Non-Native Plants that Threaten Wildlands".
Section 1: Impact | |
---|---|
Question 1.1 Impact on abiotic ecosystem processes? | U Reviewed Scientific Publication |
Identify ecosystem processes impacted: possibly water availability inference from the species invasiveness in wetlands Sources of information: Randall, RP, and SG Lloyd. 2003. Weed warning from downunder. CalEPPC News 11 (1) 4-6.; |
|
Question 1.2 Impact on plant community composition, structure, and interactions? |
C Observational |
Identify type of impact or alteration: displaces native wetland species observations Sources of information: Peter Warner |
|
Question 1.3 Impact on higher trophic levels? | U |
Identify type of impact or alteration: probable toxicity to vertebrates inferred from human toxicity from oxalate crystals Sources of information: Russell, AB, JW Hardin, L Grand, and A Fraser. 1997. Poisonous Plants of North Carolina. On-line reference at http://www.ces.ncsu.edu/depts/hort/consumer/poison/Zanteae.htm |
|
Question 1.4 Impact on genetic integrity? | D Other Published Material |
none known; no native species closely related inferred from available phylogenetic information Sources of information: Hickman, JC, et al. 1993. The Jepson Manual: Higher Vascular Plants of California |
|
Section 2: Invasiveness | |
Question 2.1 Role of anthropogenic and natural disturbance in establishment? |
B Observational |
Describe role of disturbance: little or no apparent human-caused disturbance needed observational _ sites invaded not clearly disturbed; may invade in wetlands with altered nutrient regimes, pH levels, etc. Sources of information: Peter Warner (personal observations) |
|
Question 2.2 Local rate of spread with no management? | B Observational |
Describe rate of spread: appears to be increasing, invading into additional wetland habitats at a moderate rate general observation Sources of information: Peter Warner |
|
Question 2.3 Recent trend in total area infested within state? | B Observational |
Describe trend: estimated to be slowly increasing in range and sites invaded; many suitable habitats remain uninfested personal observations; CLIMATE computer-modelling program Sources of information: Peter Warner (personal observations); |
|
Question 2.4 Innate reproductive potential? | A Other Published Material |
Describe key reproductive characteristics: Pacific Island Ecosystems at Risk website (http://www.hear.org/pier/zaaet.htm); Peter Warner (personal observations) Sources of information: widely sold, propagated, and cultivated commercially; rhizomes dispersed by dumping of garden waste most available information on this taxon is about its horticultural uses; personal observations |
|
Question 2.5 Potential for human-caused dispersal? | A Other Published Material |
Identify dispersal mechanisms: widely sold, propagated, and cultivated commercially; rhizomes dispersed by dumping of garden waste most available information on this taxon is about its horticultural uses; personal observations Sources of information: numerous horticulturally oriented websites (http://www.geocities.com/RainForest/Vines/7025/calla_lily.html; http://www.mobot.org/gardeninghelp/plantfinder/codea/A475.shtml); Peter Warner (personal observations) |
|
Question 2.6 Potential for natural long-distance dispersal? | B Other Published Material |
Identify dispersal mechanisms: seeds dispersed by birds written information; also inferred from observations of new populations or those restricted to one or a few plants, these suggesting that plants originated from seed dispersal and not from rhizomes Sources of information: Pacific Island Ecosystems at Risk website (http://www.hear.org/pier/zaaet.htm); |
|
Question 2.7 Other regions invaded? | B Other Published Material |
Identify other regions: southern Australia wetlands and mesic areas written report Sources of information: Randall, RP, and SG Lloyd. 2003. Weed warning from downunder. CalEPPC News 11 (1) 4-6 |
|
Section 3: Distribution | |
Question 3.1 Ecological amplitude/Range? | B Observational |
invasive in freshwater wetlands written information; observations Sources of information: Randall, RP, and SG Lloyd. 2003. Weed warning from downunder. CalEPPC News 11 (1) 4-6 |
|
Question 3.2 Distribution/Peak frequency? | D Observational |
Describe distribution: common in north coastal wetlands and seeps, but many such sites not invaded observations Sources of information: Peter Warner (personal observations) |
Worksheet A - Innate reproductive potential
Reaches reproductive maturity in 2 years or less | Yes |
Dense infestations produce >1,000 viable seed per square meter | No |
Populations of this species produce seeds every year. | Yes |
Seed production sustained over 3 or more months within a population annually | No |
Seeds remain viable in soil for three or more years | Unknown |
Viable seed produced with both self-pollination and cross-pollination | Unknown |
Has quickly spreading vegetative structures (rhizomes, roots, etc.) that may root at nodes | Yes |
Fragments easily and fragments can become established elsewhere | Yes |
Resprouts readily when cut, grazed, or burned | Yes |
Total points: | 6 |
Total unknowns: | 2 |
Total score: | A? |
Related traits:
Worksheet B - Arizona Ecological Types is not included here
Worksheet C - California Ecological Types
(sensu Holland 1986)Major Ecological Types | Minor Ecological Types | Code? |
---|---|---|
Marine Systems | marine systems | |
Freshwater and Estuarine | lakes, ponds, reservoirs | |
Aquatic Systems | rivers, streams, canals | |
estuaries | ||
Dunes | coastal | |
desert | ||
interior | ||
Scrub and Chaparral | coastal bluff scrub | |
coastal scrub | ||
Sonoran desert scrub | ||
Mojavean desert scrub (incl. Joshua tree woodland) | ||
Great Basin scrub | ||
chenopod scrub | ||
montane dwarf scrub | ||
Upper Sonoran subshrub scrub | ||
chaparral | D, < 5% | |
Grasslands, Vernal Pools, Meadows, and other Herb Communities | coastal prairie | |
valley and foothill grassland | ||
Great Basin grassland | ||
vernal pool | ||
meadow and seep | ||
alkali playa | ||
pebble plain | D, < 5% | |
Bog and Marsh | bog and fen | D, < 5% |
marsh and swamp | ||
Riparian and Bottomland habitat | riparian forest | |
riparian woodland | ||
riparian scrub (incl.desert washes) | ||
Woodland | cismontane woodland | |
piñon and juniper woodland | ||
Sonoran thorn woodland | ||
Forest | broadleaved upland forest | |
North Coast coniferous forest | ||
closed cone coniferous forest | ||
lower montane coniferous forest | ||
upper montane coniferous forest | ||
subalpine coniferous forest | ||
Alpine Habitats | alpine boulder and rock field | |
alpine dwarf scrub | ||
Amplitude (breadth): | B | |
Distribution (highest score): | D |
Infested Jepson Regions
Click here for a map of Jepson regions
- Central West
- Great Valley
- Northwest
- Sierra Nevada
- Southwest