Plant Assessment Form
More Silybum marianum resources
Silybum marianum
Synonyms: Carduus marianus L., Carduus mariae Crantz, Cirsium maculatum Scop., Cathamus maculatum (Scop.) Lam., Silybum maculatum (Scop.) Moench, Silybum mariae (Crantz) Gray, Mariana lactea Hill
Common Names: milk thistle; variegated thistle; blessed milk thistle; Virgin Mary's thistle; Lady's milk; Holy thistle; spotted thistle; cabbage thistle; spotted thistle; St. Mary's thistle; white thistle
Evaluated on: 7/20/04
List committee review date: 27/08/2004
Re-evaluation date:
Evaluator(s)
California Invasive Plant Council
1442-A Walnut St. #462, Berkeley, CA 94709
510.843.3902, 650.210.9453
brichardson@cal-ipc.org
University of California
Weed Science Program, Robbins Hall, Davis, CA 95616
530-754-8715
ditomaso@vegmail.ucdavis.edu
List committee members
Peter WarnerJoe DiTomaso
Alison Stanton
Jake Sigg
Cynthia Roye
John Randall
General Comments
No general comments for this species
Table 2. Criteria, Section, and Overall Scores
Overall Score?
Limited
|
Alert Status?
No Alert
|
Documentation?
3.5 out of 5
|
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | Documentation | |||
1.1 | ?Impact on abiotic ecosystem processes | D. Negligible | Observational | |
1.2 | ?Impact on plant community | C. Minor | Reviewed Scientific Publication | |
1.3 | ?Impact on higher trophic levels | D. Negligible | Reviewed Scientific Publication | |
1.4 | ?Impact on genetic integrity | D. None | Other Published Material | |
2.1 | ?Role of anthropogenic and natural disturbance in establishment | C. Minor | Reviewed Scientific Publication | |
2.2 | ?Local rate of spread with no management | B. Increases less rapidly | Reviewed Scientific Publication | |
2.3 | ?Recent trend in total area infested within state | C. Stable | Reviewed Scientific Publication | |
2.4 |
?Innate reproductive potential (see Worksheet A) |
A. High | Reviewed Scientific Publication | |
2.5 | ?Potential for human-caused dispersal | C. Low | Other Published Material | |
2.6 | ? Potential for natural long-distance dispersal | C. Rare | Reviewed Scientific Publication | |
2.7 | ?Other regions invaded | C. Already invaded | Reviewed Scientific Publication | |
3.1 |
?Ecological amplitude/Range (see Worksheet C) |
A. Widespread | Reviewed Scientific Publication | |
3.2 |
?Distribution/Peak frequency (see Worksheet C) |
B. Moderate | Observational |
Table 3. Documentation
Scores are explained in the "Criteria for Categorizing Invasive Non-Native Plants that Threaten Wildlands".
Section 1: Impact | |
---|---|
Question 1.1 Impact on abiotic ecosystem processes? | D Observational |
Identify ecosystem processes impacted: None identified in literature. Dead skeletons remain standing throughout the summer, often along roadways or other human corridors. These skeletons may serve to carry human-ignited fires into neighboring grasslands or shrubs. This could increase fire frequency in some grassland areas. Mostly found in disturbed areas and along roadsides and fencelines. Not very common in wildlands. No mention of increases in fire frequency is made in the literature. My observations are just that. Sources of information: Personal observation, Brianna Richardson brichardson@cal-ipc.org. |
|
Question 1.2 Impact on plant community composition, structure, and interactions? |
C Reviewed Scientific Publication |
Identify type of impact or alteration: Plants develop large (up to 3 feet in diameter) rosettes that block light to nearby vegetation and suppress germination and growth. Plants can reach 2-3 m in height, and skeletons continue to stand for several months, keeping an area bare of other vegetation. Infestations can be dense and dominate pasture. In nutrient enriched sites (ex. ruderal areas), where S. marianum grows more vigorously (than in un-enriched sites) species diversity can be considerably lower than where S. marianum grows less vigorously. Sources of information: 1) Sindel, B.M. 1997. "The persistance and management of thistles in Australian pastures." New Zealand Plant Protection Society. Accessed July 19, 2004. www.hortnet.co.nz/publications/nzpps/proceedings/97/97_453.htm. |
|
Question 1.3 Impact on higher trophic levels? | D Reviewed Scientific Publication |
Identify type of impact or alteration: Dense clumps provide shelter for rabbits. S. marianum invasion increases the food supply (seeds) for rodents and birds. More than 47 species of insect have been found to feed or reproduce on S. marianum in southern California. At least 26 of these insects are economically damaging crop pests. S. marianum can be toxic to sheep and cattle, especially under wet conditions or times of high soil moisture. Though potentially poisonous to grazers (deer) no mention was made of grazers eating S. marianum. It is believed to be unpalatable unless damaged by cutting or herbicide application. No other significant impacts on higher trophic levels were mentioned. Though S. marianum can push out native plant cover (thereby impacting wildlife) this is usually limited in scale [see 1.2]. Sources of information: |
|
Question 1.4 Impact on genetic integrity? | D Other Published Material |
None. No native Silybums exist in California. Sources of information: Keil, D.J. 1993. Asteracea family. In: The Jepson Manual. Published by the University of Californa. |
|
Section 2: Invasiveness | |
Question 2.1 Role of anthropogenic and natural disturbance in establishment? |
B Reviewed Scientific Publication |
Describe role of disturbance: Plants are larger, have more flowering heads, and a higher number of achenes per head in nutrient-enriched sites like waste places and ruderal zones, than those that grow in un-enriched sites. Plants are less likely to colonize and thrive in sites undisturbed by human activity. Sources of information: |
|
Question 2.2 Local rate of spread with no management? | B Reviewed Scientific Publication |
Describe rate of spread: Rapidly spread through the central valleys of CA in the 1940's. Can spread quickly to dominate discontinuous habitat. Requires disturbance to spread. Infestations will remain localized unless disturbance becomes more widespread. Sources of information: |
|
Question 2.3 Recent trend in total area infested within state? | C Reviewed Scientific Publication |
Describe trend: Increasing but not rapidly. Plants are larger, have more flowering heads, and a higher number of achenes per head in nutrient-enriched sites like waste places and ruderal zones, than those that grow in un-enriched sites. Plants are less likely to colonize and thrive in sites undisturbed by human activity. Requires disturbance to spread. Infestations will remain localized unless disturbance becomes more widespread. Though the plant is not usually targeted by management efforts, its requirement for disturbance and its preference for nutrient rich soils limits its spread. Sources of information: |
|
Question 2.4 Innate reproductive potential? | A Reviewed Scientific Publication |
Describe key reproductive characteristics: Seeds can remain viable for at least 9 years. Dense stands in California can produce 1.4 million viable seeds per acre. Seed production can vary from 1.2 heads producing 42 seeds to 8.8 heads producing 876 seeds. One study found plants could produce as many as 6350 seeds/plant. Sources of information: |
|
Question 2.5 Potential for human-caused dispersal? | C Other Published Material |
Identify dispersal mechanisms: Hay contamination is a common problem in Victoria, Australia. Seeds disperse long distances with human activities, often found along trail margins in grassland and chaparral. Long distance transport is probably rare though. Human dispersal does spread S. marianum, but the means (as a seed contaminate, by trail users) are less troublesome than if the plant were sold horticulturally or used in revegetation work. Sources of information: 1) DiTomaso, J., E. Healy. unpublished. Weeds of California and Other Western States. |
|
Question 2.6 Potential for natural long-distance dispersal? | C Reviewed Scientific Publication |
Identify dispersal mechanisms: Seeds equipped with a large pappus that enables effective though short-distance spread by wind. Seeds are consumed by birds, rodents, and insects. Seeds probably dipersed by water and soil movement. S.marianum spread rapidly through the central valleys of California during the 1940s. It spread to dominate a discontinuous habitat in a short period of time. Though evidence that the seeds are spread by birds and animals is somewhat lacking, and the seeds are too large to be wind-borne for long distances, this plant has historically spread quickly over large distances, and therefore may still be able to do so. Sources of information: |
|
Question 2.7 Other regions invaded? | C Reviewed Scientific Publication |
Identify other regions: Invades pastures, ruderal areas, and ant hills in Australia, Tasmania, Israel. Also found in Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Connecticut, Indiana, Lousiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia. S. marianum is an invader in other Mediterranean climates, but largely invades habitat similar to the habitat it is already found in here. Sources of information: 1) Gabay, R.; U. Plitmann; A. Danin. 1994. Factors affecting the dominance of Silybum marianum L. (Asteraceae) in its specific habitats. Flora v. 189: 201-206. |
|
Section 3: Distribution | |
Question 3.1 Ecological amplitude/Range? | A Reviewed Scientific Publication |
Widely naturalized in California, particularly in coastal counties, but also inland. First recorded in CA in 1854. Common in coastal and inland valleys. Is found in at least 3 major ecological types and 7 minor ecological types. Sources of information: 1) Klinger, Rob. 1999. Weed Report: Silybum marianum. TNC Wildland Weed Survey. |
|
Question 3.2 Distribution/Peak frequency? | B Observational |
Describe distribution: I estimate it's in >50% of the grasslands in the SF Bay area. D.Chang estimates it's in 80% of the grasslands (rangelands) and oak woodlands in Santa Barbara County. Present in 21-50% of valley and foothill grasslands in CA. Sources of information: 1) Personal observation: Brianna Richardson brichardson@cal-ipc.org |
Worksheet A - Innate reproductive potential
Reaches reproductive maturity in 2 years or less | Yes |
Dense infestations produce >1,000 viable seed per square meter | Yes |
Populations of this species produce seeds every year. | Yes |
Seed production sustained over 3 or more months within a population annually | Unknown |
Seeds remain viable in soil for three or more years | Yes |
Viable seed produced with both self-pollination and cross-pollination | Unknown |
Has quickly spreading vegetative structures (rhizomes, roots, etc.) that may root at nodes | No |
Fragments easily and fragments can become established elsewhere | No |
Resprouts readily when cut, grazed, or burned | No |
Total points: | 6 |
Total unknowns: | 2 |
Total score: | A? |
Related traits:
Worksheet B - Arizona Ecological Types is not included here
Worksheet C - California Ecological Types
(sensu Holland 1986)Major Ecological Types | Minor Ecological Types | Code? |
---|---|---|
Marine Systems | marine systems | |
Freshwater and Estuarine | lakes, ponds, reservoirs | |
Aquatic Systems | rivers, streams, canals | |
estuaries | ||
Dunes | coastal | |
desert | ||
interior | ||
Scrub and Chaparral | coastal bluff scrub | |
coastal scrub | D, < 5% | |
Sonoran desert scrub | ||
Mojavean desert scrub (incl. Joshua tree woodland) | ||
Great Basin scrub | ||
chenopod scrub | ||
montane dwarf scrub | ||
Upper Sonoran subshrub scrub | ||
chaparral | D, < 5% | |
Grasslands, Vernal Pools, Meadows, and other Herb Communities | coastal prairie | C, 5% - 20% |
valley and foothill grassland | B, 20% - 50% | |
Great Basin grassland | ||
vernal pool | ||
meadow and seep | ||
alkali playa | ||
pebble plain | ||
Bog and Marsh | bog and fen | |
marsh and swamp | ||
Riparian and Bottomland habitat | riparian forest | |
riparian woodland | D, < 5% | |
riparian scrub (incl.desert washes) | D, < 5% | |
Woodland | cismontane woodland | D, < 5% |
piñon and juniper woodland | ||
Sonoran thorn woodland | ||
Forest | broadleaved upland forest | |
North Coast coniferous forest | ||
closed cone coniferous forest | ||
lower montane coniferous forest | ||
upper montane coniferous forest | ||
subalpine coniferous forest | ||
Alpine Habitats | alpine boulder and rock field | |
alpine dwarf scrub | ||
Amplitude (breadth): | A | |
Distribution (highest score): | B |
Infested Jepson Regions
Click here for a map of Jepson regions
- CA Floristic Province
- Cascade Range
- Central West
- Great Valley
- Northwest
- Sierra Nevada
- Southwest
- Mojave Desert