Plant Assessment Form
More Rumex crispus resources
Rumex crispus
Common Names: curly dock
Evaluated on: 4/15/04
List committee review date: 14/05/2004
Re-evaluation date:
Evaluator(s)
Saint Mary's College of California
P.O. Box 4093, Moraga, CA 94575
(925) 631-5384
msarkis@stmarys-ca.edu
List committee members
Carla BossardCynthia Roye
Alison Stanton
Peter Warner
Joe DiTomaso
General Comments
No general comments for this species
Table 2. Criteria, Section, and Overall Scores
Overall Score?
Limited
|
Alert Status?
No Alert
|
Documentation?
3.5 out of 5
|
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | Documentation | |||
1.1 | ?Impact on abiotic ecosystem processes | D. Negligible | Reviewed Scientific Publication | |
1.2 | ?Impact on plant community | C. Minor | Reviewed Scientific Publication | |
1.3 | ?Impact on higher trophic levels | C. Minor | Reviewed Scientific Publication | |
1.4 | ?Impact on genetic integrity | D. None | Anecdotal | |
2.1 | ?Role of anthropogenic and natural disturbance in establishment | B. Moderate | Reviewed Scientific Publication | |
2.2 | ?Local rate of spread with no management | C. Stable | Reviewed Scientific Publication | |
2.3 | ?Recent trend in total area infested within state | C. Stable | Anecdotal | |
2.4 |
?Innate reproductive potential (see Worksheet A) |
B. Moderate | Reviewed Scientific Publication | |
2.5 | ?Potential for human-caused dispersal | C. Low | Reviewed Scientific Publication | |
2.6 | ? Potential for natural long-distance dispersal | B. Occasional | Anecdotal | |
2.7 | ?Other regions invaded | C. Already invaded | Reviewed Scientific Publication | |
3.1 |
?Ecological amplitude/Range (see Worksheet C) |
A. Widespread | Reviewed Scientific Publication | |
3.2 |
?Distribution/Peak frequency (see Worksheet C) |
A. High | Reviewed Scientific Publication |
Table 3. Documentation
Scores are explained in the "Criteria for Categorizing Invasive Non-Native Plants that Threaten Wildlands".
Section 1: Impact | |
---|---|
Question 1.1 Impact on abiotic ecosystem processes? | D Reviewed Scientific Publication |
Identify ecosystem processes impacted: negligible impact found no evidence to support an abiotic ecosystem process change Sources of information: No speceific data site |
|
Question 1.2 Impact on plant community composition, structure, and interactions? |
C Reviewed Scientific Publication |
Identify type of impact or alteration: Creation of a new structural layer, and also pushes out native species once established Curly Dock has a deep tap root Sources of information: Monaco, T.J., Growth and development of Curly Dock and Broadleaf Dock. Weed Science, Jan 1972. 64-67 |
|
Question 1.3 Impact on higher trophic levels? | C Reviewed Scientific Publication |
Identify type of impact or alteration: Once established, it easily takes over the habitat. But no specifics were mentioned Curly Dock is easily spread Sources of information: Monaco, T.J., Growth and development of Curly Dock and Broadleaf Dock. Weed Science, Jan 1972. 64-67 |
|
Question 1.4 Impact on genetic integrity? | D Anecdotal |
no impact No documentation showing impact on gentic integrity Sources of information: no specific documentation noted |
|
Section 2: Invasiveness | |
Question 2.1 Role of anthropogenic and natural disturbance in establishment? |
C Reviewed Scientific Publication |
Describe role of disturbance: Sources of information: Maun, M.A. Biography of Curly Dock. Weeds Today. Feb/March 1977, 14,19 |
|
Question 2.2 Local rate of spread with no management? | C Reviewed Scientific Publication |
Describe rate of spread: Very quick rate of spread without management Large spread due to heavy seed propagulation (40,000 a plant) and seed dormancy Sources of information: Monaco, T.J., Growth and development of Curly Dock and Broadleaf Dock. Weed Science, Jan 1972. 64-67 |
|
Question 2.3 Recent trend in total area infested within state? | C Anecdotal |
Describe trend: No specific data sited, but assuming that it is spread easily Assumed that spread is quick due to the large seed propagulation and seed dormancy Sources of information: no specific sources noted |
|
Question 2.4 Innate reproductive potential? | B Reviewed Scientific Publication |
Describe key reproductive characteristics: High reproductive potential Assumed that spread is quick due to the large seed propagulation and seed dormancy Sources of information: Monaco, T.J., Growth and development of Curly Dock and Broadleaf Dock. Weed Science, Jan 1972. 64-67 |
|
Question 2.5 Potential for human-caused dispersal? | C Reviewed Scientific Publication |
Identify dispersal mechanisms: seeds transferable as manure because it is not digested outer seed coat is not digested by cattle, and thus it can be spread through manure Sources of information: Foster, L. The biology and non-chemical control of dock species Rumex obtusifolious and Rumex crispus. Biological Agricultural and Horticulture: an international journal |
|
Question 2.6 Potential for natural long-distance dispersal? | B Anecdotal |
Identify dispersal mechanisms: human dispersal only no mention of direct disperal greater than 1km Sources of information: no source noted |
|
Question 2.7 Other regions invaded? | C Reviewed Scientific Publication |
Identify other regions: Lakes, ponds, rivers, streams, canals, reserviors, grasslands, swamps. These were identified areas of dock infestations Sources of information: Foster, L. The biology and non-chemical control of dock species Rumex obtusifolious and Rumex crispus. Biological Agricultural and Horticulture: an international journal and Maun, M.A. Biography of Curly Dock. Weeds Today. Feb/March 1977, 14,19 |
|
Section 3: Distribution | |
Question 3.1 Ecological amplitude/Range? | A Reviewed Scientific Publication |
Moderate ecological amplitude Sources of information: Foster, L. The biology and non-chemical control of dock species Rumex obtusifolious and Rumex crispus. Biological Agricultural and Horticulture: an international journal and Maun, M.A. Biography of Curly Dock. Weeds Today. Feb/March 1977, 14,19 |
|
Question 3.2 Distribution/Peak frequency? | A Reviewed Scientific Publication |
Describe distribution: Sources of information: |
Worksheet A - Innate reproductive potential
Reaches reproductive maturity in 2 years or less | Yes |
Dense infestations produce >1,000 viable seed per square meter | No |
Populations of this species produce seeds every year. | Yes |
Seed production sustained over 3 or more months within a population annually | Unknown |
Seeds remain viable in soil for three or more years | Yes |
Viable seed produced with both self-pollination and cross-pollination | Unknown |
Has quickly spreading vegetative structures (rhizomes, roots, etc.) that may root at nodes | No |
Fragments easily and fragments can become established elsewhere | No |
Resprouts readily when cut, grazed, or burned | Yes |
Total points: | 5 |
Total unknowns: | 2 |
Total score: | B? |
Related traits:
Worksheet B - Arizona Ecological Types is not included here
Worksheet C - California Ecological Types
(sensu Holland 1986)Major Ecological Types | Minor Ecological Types | Code? |
---|---|---|
Marine Systems | marine systems | |
Freshwater and Estuarine | lakes, ponds, reservoirs | |
Aquatic Systems | rivers, streams, canals | |
estuaries | ||
Dunes | coastal | |
desert | ||
interior | ||
Scrub and Chaparral | coastal bluff scrub | |
coastal scrub | ||
Sonoran desert scrub | ||
Mojavean desert scrub (incl. Joshua tree woodland) | ||
Great Basin scrub | ||
chenopod scrub | ||
montane dwarf scrub | ||
Upper Sonoran subshrub scrub | ||
chaparral | A, > 50% | |
Grasslands, Vernal Pools, Meadows, and other Herb Communities | coastal prairie | D, < 5% |
valley and foothill grassland | ||
Great Basin grassland | C, 5% - 20% | |
vernal pool | B, 20% - 50% | |
meadow and seep | ||
alkali playa | ||
pebble plain | ||
Bog and Marsh | bog and fen | C, 5% - 20% |
marsh and swamp | ||
Riparian and Bottomland habitat | riparian forest | D, < 5% |
riparian woodland | D, < 5% | |
riparian scrub (incl.desert washes) | ||
Woodland | cismontane woodland | |
piñon and juniper woodland | ||
Sonoran thorn woodland | ||
Forest | broadleaved upland forest | |
North Coast coniferous forest | ||
closed cone coniferous forest | ||
lower montane coniferous forest | ||
upper montane coniferous forest | ||
subalpine coniferous forest | ||
Alpine Habitats | alpine boulder and rock field | |
alpine dwarf scrub | ||
Amplitude (breadth): | A | |
Distribution (highest score): | A |
Infested Jepson Regions
Click here for a map of Jepson regions
- CA Floristic Province
- Cascade Range
- Central West
- Great Valley
- Northwest
- Sierra Nevada
- Southwest
- Great Basin Province
- Modoc Plateau
- Sierra Nevada East
- Desert Province
- Mojave Desert
- Sonoran Desert