Plant Assessment Form
More Ononis alopecuroides resources
Ononis alopecuroides
Common Names: foxtail restharrow
Evaluated on: 1-Aug-03
List committee review date: 01/08/2003
Re-evaluation date:
Evaluator(s)
UC Davis
Weed Science Program, Robbins Hall, Univ. California, Davis CA 95616
530-754-8715
DiTomaso@vegmail.ucdavis.edu
List committee members
Jake SiggPeter Warner
Doug Johnson
Joe DiTomaso
Brianna Richardson
General Comments
No general comments for this species
Table 2. Criteria, Section, and Overall Scores
Overall Score?
Limited
|
Alert Status?
No Alert
|
Documentation?
2.5 out of 5
|
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | Documentation | |||
1.1 | ?Impact on abiotic ecosystem processes | U. Unknown | Reviewed Scientific Publication | |
1.2 | ?Impact on plant community | B. Moderate | Other Published Material | |
1.3 | ?Impact on higher trophic levels | U. Unknown | ||
1.4 | ?Impact on genetic integrity | D. None | Observational | |
2.1 | ?Role of anthropogenic and natural disturbance in establishment | B. Moderate | Other Published Material | |
2.2 | ?Local rate of spread with no management | A. Increases rapidly | Other Published Material | |
2.3 | ?Recent trend in total area infested within state | D. Declining | Observational | |
2.4 |
?Innate reproductive potential (see Worksheet A) |
A. High | Other Published Material | |
2.5 | ?Potential for human-caused dispersal | C. Low | Observational | |
2.6 | ? Potential for natural long-distance dispersal | C. Rare | Observational | |
2.7 | ?Other regions invaded | C. Already invaded | Other Published Material | |
3.1 |
?Ecological amplitude/Range (see Worksheet C) |
B. Moderate | Other Published Material | |
3.2 |
?Distribution/Peak frequency (see Worksheet C) |
D. Very low | Other Published Material |
Table 3. Documentation
Scores are explained in the "Criteria for Categorizing Invasive Non-Native Plants that Threaten Wildlands".
Section 1: Impact | |
---|---|
Question 1.1 Impact on abiotic ecosystem processes? | U Reviewed Scientific Publication |
Identify ecosystem processes impacted: Unknown Sources of information: |
|
Question 1.2 Impact on plant community composition, structure, and interactions? |
B Other Published Material |
Identify type of impact or alteration: Forms dense stands that are capable of excluding other vegetation. Sources of information: Tu, M. 2002. Ononis alopecuroides. The Nature Conservancy. Weed Alert! http://tncweeds.ucdavis.edu/alert/alrtonon.html |
|
Question 1.3 Impact on higher trophic levels? | U |
Identify type of impact or alteration: Unpalatable to horses and burros. No information on wildlife palatability. Sources of information: Tu, M. 2002. Ononis alopecuroides. The Nature Conservancy. Weed Alert! http://tncweeds.ucdavis.edu/alert/alrtonon.html |
|
Question 1.4 Impact on genetic integrity? | D Observational |
Probably none. No other species of Ononis in California. Sources of information: |
|
Section 2: Invasiveness | |
Question 2.1 Role of anthropogenic and natural disturbance in establishment? |
A Other Published Material |
Describe role of disturbance: Can move into disturbed areas but also expands into adjacent grassland and dry rocky areas. Weed of agricultural areas and disturbed fields. Sources of information: Tu, M. 2002. Ononis alopecuroides. The Nature Conservancy. Weed Alert! http://tncweeds.ucdavis.edu/alert/alrtonon.html; DiTomaso, J.M. and E. A. Healy. 2005. Weeds of California. Div. Nat. Agr. Res. Univ. California (in press) |
|
Question 2.2 Local rate of spread with no management? | A Other Published Material |
Describe rate of spread: Spreads rapidly when established. San Luis Obispo County reported rapid spread with led to Q listing by CDFA. Sources of information: Tu, M. 2002. Ononis alopecuroides. The Nature Conservancy. Weed Alert! http://tncweeds.ucdavis.edu/alert/alrtonon.html; DiTomaso, J.M. and E. A. Healy. 2005. Weeds of California. Div. Nat. Agr. Res. Univ. California (in press) |
|
Question 2.3 Recent trend in total area infested within state? | D Observational |
Describe trend: Nearly eradicated from state due to County and CDFA control efforts. Sources of information: Tu, M. 2002. Ononis alopecuroides. The Nature Conservancy. Weed Alert! http://tncweeds.ucdavis.edu/alert/alrtonon.html; SLO County reports |
|
Question 2.4 Innate reproductive potential? | A Other Published Material |
Describe key reproductive characteristics: Tu, M. 2002. Ononis alopecuroides. The Nature Conservancy. Weed Alert! http://tncweeds.ucdavis.edu/alert/alrtonon.html; DiTomaso, J.M. and E. A. Healy. 2005. Weeds of California. Div. Nat. Agr. Res. Univ. California (in press) Sources of information: Probably seed contaminant in pasture species, presumably Trifolium seed. |
|
Question 2.5 Potential for human-caused dispersal? | C Observational |
Identify dispersal mechanisms: Probably seed contaminant in pasture species, presumably Trifolium seed. Sources of information: Tu, M. 2002. Ononis alopecuroides. The Nature Conservancy. Weed Alert! http://tncweeds.ucdavis.edu/alert/alrtonon.html; SLO County report |
|
Question 2.6 Potential for natural long-distance dispersal? | C Observational |
Identify dispersal mechanisms: Does not seem to have a well developed long distance dispersal mechanism. Sources of information: Observational, DiTomaso |
|
Question 2.7 Other regions invaded? | C Other Published Material |
Identify other regions: Also weedy in northern and central Europe. Sources of information: Tu, M. 2002. Ononis alopecuroides. The Nature Conservancy. Weed Alert! http://tncweeds.ucdavis.edu/alert/alrtonon.html |
|
Section 3: Distribution | |
Question 3.1 Ecological amplitude/Range? | B Other Published Material |
First introduced in about the 1990s. Only found in grasslands and woodland-savannas of San Luis Obispo County. Sources of information: Tu, M. 2002. Ononis alopecuroides. The Nature Conservancy. Weed Alert! http://tncweeds.ucdavis.edu/alert/alrtonon.html; DiTomaso, J.M. and E. A. Healy. 2005. Weeds of California. Div. Nat. Agr. Res. Univ. California (in press) |
|
Question 3.2 Distribution/Peak frequency? | D Other Published Material |
Describe distribution: Very uncommon, close to eradicated. Sources of information: DiTomaso, J.M. and E. A. Healy. 2005. Weeds of California. Div. Nat. Agr. Res. Univ. California (in press); observational by CDFA and SLO County |
Worksheet A - Innate reproductive potential
Reaches reproductive maturity in 2 years or less | Yes |
Dense infestations produce >1,000 viable seed per square meter | Yes |
Populations of this species produce seeds every year. | Yes |
Seed production sustained over 3 or more months within a population annually | No |
Seeds remain viable in soil for three or more years | Yes |
Viable seed produced with both self-pollination and cross-pollination | Yes |
Has quickly spreading vegetative structures (rhizomes, roots, etc.) that may root at nodes | No |
Fragments easily and fragments can become established elsewhere | No |
Resprouts readily when cut, grazed, or burned | No |
Total points: | 7 |
Total unknowns: | 0 |
Total score: | A? |
Related traits:
Worksheet B - Arizona Ecological Types is not included here
Worksheet C - California Ecological Types
(sensu Holland 1986)Major Ecological Types | Minor Ecological Types | Code? |
---|---|---|
Marine Systems | marine systems | |
Freshwater and Estuarine | lakes, ponds, reservoirs | |
Aquatic Systems | rivers, streams, canals | |
estuaries | ||
Dunes | coastal | |
desert | ||
interior | ||
Scrub and Chaparral | coastal bluff scrub | |
coastal scrub | ||
Sonoran desert scrub | ||
Mojavean desert scrub (incl. Joshua tree woodland) | ||
Great Basin scrub | ||
chenopod scrub | ||
montane dwarf scrub | ||
Upper Sonoran subshrub scrub | ||
chaparral | ||
Grasslands, Vernal Pools, Meadows, and other Herb Communities | coastal prairie | D, < 5% |
valley and foothill grassland | ||
Great Basin grassland | ||
vernal pool | ||
meadow and seep | ||
alkali playa | ||
pebble plain | ||
Bog and Marsh | bog and fen | |
marsh and swamp | ||
Riparian and Bottomland habitat | riparian forest | |
riparian woodland | ||
riparian scrub (incl.desert washes) | D, < 5% | |
Woodland | cismontane woodland | |
piñon and juniper woodland | ||
Sonoran thorn woodland | ||
Forest | broadleaved upland forest | |
North Coast coniferous forest | ||
closed cone coniferous forest | ||
lower montane coniferous forest | ||
upper montane coniferous forest | ||
subalpine coniferous forest | ||
Alpine Habitats | alpine boulder and rock field | |
alpine dwarf scrub | ||
Amplitude (breadth): | B | |
Distribution (highest score): | D |
Infested Jepson Regions
Click here for a map of Jepson regions
- Central West