Plant Assessment Form
More Hypochaeris radicata resources
Hypochaeris radicata
Common Names: rough cat's-ear; false dandelion
Evaluated on: 7/30/03
List committee review date: 01/08/2003
Re-evaluation date:
Evaluator(s)
California Dept. of Parks and Recreation; CalEPPC
P. O. Box 603, Little River, CA 95456-0603
(707) 937-9172; (707) 937-2278
pwarner@mcn.org
List committee members
Jake SiggPeter Warner
Joe DiTomaso
Doug Johnson
Brianna Richardson
General Comments
No general comments for this species
Table 2. Criteria, Section, and Overall Scores
Overall Score?
Moderate
|
Alert Status?
No Alert
|
Documentation?
2.5 out of 5
|
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | Documentation | |||
1.1 | ?Impact on abiotic ecosystem processes | U. Unknown | Reviewed Scientific Publication | |
1.2 | ?Impact on plant community | B. Moderate | Observational | |
1.3 | ?Impact on higher trophic levels | C. Minor | Other Published Material | |
1.4 | ?Impact on genetic integrity | D. None | Other Published Material | |
2.1 | ?Role of anthropogenic and natural disturbance in establishment | B. Moderate | Other Published Material | |
2.2 | ?Local rate of spread with no management | A. Increases rapidly | Observational | |
2.3 | ?Recent trend in total area infested within state | C. Stable | Observational | |
2.4 |
?Innate reproductive potential (see Worksheet A) |
A. High | Other Published Material | |
2.5 | ?Potential for human-caused dispersal | B. Moderate | Observational | |
2.6 | ? Potential for natural long-distance dispersal | A. Frequent | Observational | |
2.7 | ?Other regions invaded | C. Already invaded | Other Published Material | |
3.1 |
?Ecological amplitude/Range (see Worksheet C) |
A. Widespread | Observational | |
3.2 |
?Distribution/Peak frequency (see Worksheet C) |
A. High | Observational |
Table 3. Documentation
Scores are explained in the "Criteria for Categorizing Invasive Non-Native Plants that Threaten Wildlands".
Section 1: Impact | |
---|---|
Question 1.1 Impact on abiotic ecosystem processes? | U Reviewed Scientific Publication |
Identify ecosystem processes impacted: None known No basic research on ecology discovered Sources of information: |
|
Question 1.2 Impact on plant community composition, structure, and interactions? |
B Observational |
Identify type of impact or alteration: displacement of native species; alteration of community composition (especially coastal terrace prairie) based on personal observations Sources of information: Peter Warner, Jake Sigg, Joe DiTomaso |
|
Question 1.3 Impact on higher trophic levels? | C Other Published Material |
Identify type of impact or alteration: uncertain impacts on wildlife; reportedly the cause of Australian stringhalt in horses inference from impact on domestic mammalian herbivores that plant could harm native mammals Sources of information: Washington State Noxious Weed Control Board website |
|
Question 1.4 Impact on genetic integrity? | D Other Published Material |
None known or documented No congeners native to California Sources of information: Hickman, et al. 1993. The Jepson Manual: Higher Vascular Plants of California |
|
Section 2: Invasiveness | |
Question 2.1 Role of anthropogenic and natural disturbance in establishment? |
A Observational |
Describe role of disturbance: invades sites relatively undisturbed by human activity, but more invasive and prevalent on disturbed sites, such as grazed or burned lands, especially those in milder coastal areas some written information; personal observations; inference from extensive range in North America Sources of information: Washington State Noxious Weed Control Board; DiTomaso, J _______; U. S. Dept. of Agriculture website; Peter Warner (personal observation) |
|
Question 2.2 Local rate of spread with no management? | A Observational |
Describe rate of spread: will occupy available open soil; not as invasive in intact ecosystems; appears to respond to either soil disturbance or enhanced nitrogen levels written reports; personal observations Sources of information: Washington State Noxious Weed Control Board; DiTomaso, J; Peter Warner (personal observation) Jake Sigg |
|
Question 2.3 Recent trend in total area infested within state? | C Observational |
Describe trend: stable long-established in CA and elsewhere in North America _ inferred that range is unlikely to expand beyond previously invaded habitat Sources of information: Peter Warner (personal observation) |
|
Question 2.4 Innate reproductive potential? | A Other Published Material |
Describe key reproductive characteristics: iteroparous perennial _ Asteraceae; dispersal by seed (achene w/pappus) written material; floral characteristics Sources of information: DiTomaso, J _______; Hickman, et al. (1993) |
|
Question 2.5 Potential for human-caused dispersal? | B Observational |
Identify dispersal mechanisms: seed (attached to clothing) personal experience and observations Sources of information: Peter Warner |
|
Question 2.6 Potential for natural long-distance dispersal? | A Observational |
Identify dispersal mechanisms: seed attached to fur; wind-borneachenes w/pappus written information; personal observations Sources of information: DiTomaso, J ________.; P. Warner |
|
Question 2.7 Other regions invaded? | C Other Published Material |
Identify other regions: Pacific Northwest, northeastern, southeastern U. S.; British Isles based on distributional information from websites, published flora Sources of information: U. S. Dept. of Agriculture website; Washington State Noxious Weed Control Board |
|
Section 3: Distribution | |
Question 3.1 Ecological amplitude/Range? | A Observational |
widespread in many ecological types, especially cismontane CA based on personal observations, flora of various areas Sources of information: Hickman, et al.; USDA website; Peter Warner (personal observations) |
|
Question 3.2 Distribution/Peak frequency? | A Observational |
Describe distribution: widespread and abundant in coastal terrace prairie and coastal bluff scrub, usually one of the more dominant species personal observations, unpublished data from wetlands delineations on Sonoma and Mendocino coasts, restoration projects at GGNRA Sources of information: Peter Warner (personal observation; unpublished data |
Worksheet A - Innate reproductive potential
Reaches reproductive maturity in 2 years or less | Yes |
Dense infestations produce >1,000 viable seed per square meter | Yes |
Populations of this species produce seeds every year. | Yes |
Seed production sustained over 3 or more months within a population annually | Yes |
Seeds remain viable in soil for three or more years | No |
Viable seed produced with both self-pollination and cross-pollination | Unknown |
Has quickly spreading vegetative structures (rhizomes, roots, etc.) that may root at nodes | No |
Fragments easily and fragments can become established elsewhere | No |
Resprouts readily when cut, grazed, or burned | Yes |
Total points: | 6 |
Total unknowns: | 1 |
Total score: | A? |
Related traits:
Worksheet B - Arizona Ecological Types is not included here
Worksheet C - California Ecological Types
(sensu Holland 1986)Major Ecological Types | Minor Ecological Types | Code? |
---|---|---|
Marine Systems | marine systems | |
Freshwater and Estuarine | lakes, ponds, reservoirs | |
Aquatic Systems | rivers, streams, canals | |
estuaries | ||
Dunes | coastal | B, 20% - 50% |
desert | ||
interior | ||
Scrub and Chaparral | coastal bluff scrub | A, > 50% |
coastal scrub | C, 5% - 20% | |
Sonoran desert scrub | ||
Mojavean desert scrub (incl. Joshua tree woodland) | ||
Great Basin scrub | ||
chenopod scrub | ||
montane dwarf scrub | ||
Upper Sonoran subshrub scrub | ||
chaparral | A, > 50% | |
Grasslands, Vernal Pools, Meadows, and other Herb Communities | coastal prairie | B, 20% - 50% |
valley and foothill grassland | ||
Great Basin grassland | D, < 5% | |
vernal pool | D, < 5% | |
meadow and seep | ||
alkali playa | ||
pebble plain | ||
Bog and Marsh | bog and fen | |
marsh and swamp | ||
Riparian and Bottomland habitat | riparian forest | C, 5% - 20% |
riparian woodland | C, 5% - 20% | |
riparian scrub (incl.desert washes) | C, 5% - 20% | |
Woodland | cismontane woodland | |
piñon and juniper woodland | ||
Sonoran thorn woodland | U, Unknown | |
Forest | broadleaved upland forest | C, 5% - 20% |
North Coast coniferous forest | C, 5% - 20% | |
closed cone coniferous forest | ||
lower montane coniferous forest | ||
upper montane coniferous forest | ||
subalpine coniferous forest | ||
Alpine Habitats | alpine boulder and rock field | |
alpine dwarf scrub | ||
Amplitude (breadth): | A | |
Distribution (highest score): | A |
Infested Jepson Regions
Click here for a map of Jepson regions
- CA Floristic Province
- Cascade Range
- Central West
- Great Valley
- Northwest
- Sierra Nevada
- Southwest
- Modoc Plateau