Plant Assessment Form
More Helichrysum petiolare resources
Helichrysum petiolare
Common Names: licorice plant
Evaluated on: 5/22/03
List committee review date: 06/06/2003
Re-evaluation date:
Evaluator(s)
UC Davis
Weed Science Program, Robbins Hall, Univ. California, Davis CA 95616
530-754-8715
DiTomaso@vegmail.ucdavis.edu
List committee members
Joe DiTomasoPeter Warner
Alison Stanton
Carla Bossard
Cynthia Roye
Jake Sigg
Doug Johnson
Brianna Richardson
General Comments
No general comments for this species
Table 2. Criteria, Section, and Overall Scores
Overall Score?
Limited
|
Alert Status?
No Alert
|
Documentation?
2.5 out of 5
|
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | Documentation | |||
1.1 | ?Impact on abiotic ecosystem processes | U. Unknown | Reviewed Scientific Publication | |
1.2 | ?Impact on plant community | C. Minor | Observational | |
1.3 | ?Impact on higher trophic levels | U. Unknown | ||
1.4 | ?Impact on genetic integrity | D. None | Observational | |
2.1 | ?Role of anthropogenic and natural disturbance in establishment | A. Severe | Other Published Material | |
2.2 | ?Local rate of spread with no management | B. Increases less rapidly | Observational | |
2.3 | ?Recent trend in total area infested within state | B. Increasing less rapidly | Observational | |
2.4 |
?Innate reproductive potential (see Worksheet A) |
A. High | Other Published Material | |
2.5 | ?Potential for human-caused dispersal | A. High | Other Published Material | |
2.6 | ? Potential for natural long-distance dispersal | D. None | Other Published Material | |
2.7 | ?Other regions invaded | U. Unknown | ||
3.1 |
?Ecological amplitude/Range (see Worksheet C) |
B. Moderate | Other Published Material | |
3.2 |
?Distribution/Peak frequency (see Worksheet C) |
D. Very low | Other Published Material |
Table 3. Documentation
Scores are explained in the "Criteria for Categorizing Invasive Non-Native Plants that Threaten Wildlands".
Section 1: Impact | |
---|---|
Question 1.1 Impact on abiotic ecosystem processes? | U Reviewed Scientific Publication |
Identify ecosystem processes impacted: Unknown Not studied. Sources of information: |
|
Question 1.2 Impact on plant community composition, structure, and interactions? |
C Observational |
Identify type of impact or alteration: Appears to displace native shrubs in heavily infested areas. Can occupy about 10-25% of the cover in heavy infested area. Sources of information: Observational-DiTomaso |
|
Question 1.3 Impact on higher trophic levels? | U |
Identify type of impact or alteration: Unknown Sources of information: |
|
Question 1.4 Impact on genetic integrity? | D Observational |
Probably none. No known native species within the genus Helichrysum in California. Sources of information: Observational-DiTomaso |
|
Section 2: Invasiveness | |
Question 2.1 Role of anthropogenic and natural disturbance in establishment? |
B Observational |
Describe role of disturbance: Appears in coastal shrub areas in absence of human activity and even in sites inaccessible to most humans. Sources of information: |
|
Question 2.2 Local rate of spread with no management? | B Observational |
Describe rate of spread: Has been naturalized for at least 35 years. Appears to be increasing, but may not be doubling <10 years. Reported in Marin Flora in 1969 and in the Mendocino flora in 1990. Sources of information: Observational-DiTomaso |
|
Question 2.3 Recent trend in total area infested within state? | B Observational |
Describe trend: Same as applied to 2.2. Since populations are still localized and left uncontrolled, it is likely that it is not doubling in <10 years. Sources of information: Observational-DiTomaso |
|
Question 2.4 Innate reproductive potential? | A Other Published Material |
Describe key reproductive characteristics: Produces seed and reproduces vegetatively by fragmentation of stems. Plants are brittle and break off easily. Stem fragments can root at nodes. Sources of information: |
|
Question 2.5 Potential for human-caused dispersal? | A Other Published Material |
Identify dispersal mechanisms: Still sold by nursery industry and can move throughout coastal areas this way. Long distance movement by landscapers and subsequent short distance movement by seeds and vegetative fragments. Sources of information: Sigg, J. 1997. CalEPPC News 5(1):8; Observational-DiTomaso |
|
Question 2.6 Potential for natural long-distance dispersal? | D Other Published Material |
Identify dispersal mechanisms: Seeds not reported to disperse long distances with wind. Fragments probably remain localized unless dispersed by animals, but this is unknown. Sources of information: |
|
Question 2.7 Other regions invaded? | U |
Identify other regions: Unknown Sources of information: |
|
Section 3: Distribution | |
Question 3.1 Ecological amplitude/Range? | B Other Published Material |
Coastal shrub areas in Marin County most commonly invaded. Occasionally found on coastal bluff scrub in North Coast. Reported in coastal mixed conifer forests in Monterey County (Del Monte Forest). Introduced as an ornamental in the 1960s. Expected to invade coastal grasslands but no current reports. Sources of information: Sigg, J.2000. In, Invasive Plants of Californias Wildlands. CalEPPC. UC Press, Berkeley |
|
Question 3.2 Distribution/Peak frequency? | D Other Published Material |
Describe distribution: heavy infestation in localized areas, but not widespread yet, even in that community type. Largest infestation in Stinson Beach, CA. Sources of information: Observational-DiTomaso |
Worksheet A - Innate reproductive potential
Reaches reproductive maturity in 2 years or less | Unknown |
Dense infestations produce >1,000 viable seed per square meter | Yes |
Populations of this species produce seeds every year. | Yes |
Seed production sustained over 3 or more months within a population annually | Unknown |
Seeds remain viable in soil for three or more years | Unknown |
Viable seed produced with both self-pollination and cross-pollination | Unknown |
Has quickly spreading vegetative structures (rhizomes, roots, etc.) that may root at nodes | No |
Fragments easily and fragments can become established elsewhere | Yes |
Resprouts readily when cut, grazed, or burned | Yes |
Total points: | 6 |
Total unknowns: | 4 |
Total score: | A? |
Related traits:
Worksheet B - Arizona Ecological Types is not included here
Worksheet C - California Ecological Types
(sensu Holland 1986)Major Ecological Types | Minor Ecological Types | Code? |
---|---|---|
Marine Systems | marine systems | |
Freshwater and Estuarine | lakes, ponds, reservoirs | |
Aquatic Systems | rivers, streams, canals | |
estuaries | ||
Dunes | coastal | |
desert | ||
interior | ||
Scrub and Chaparral | coastal bluff scrub | D, < 5% |
coastal scrub | D, < 5% | |
Sonoran desert scrub | ||
Mojavean desert scrub (incl. Joshua tree woodland) | ||
Great Basin scrub | ||
chenopod scrub | ||
montane dwarf scrub | ||
Upper Sonoran subshrub scrub | ||
chaparral | ||
Grasslands, Vernal Pools, Meadows, and other Herb Communities | coastal prairie | |
valley and foothill grassland | ||
Great Basin grassland | ||
vernal pool | ||
meadow and seep | ||
alkali playa | ||
pebble plain | ||
Bog and Marsh | bog and fen | |
marsh and swamp | ||
Riparian and Bottomland habitat | riparian forest | |
riparian woodland | ||
riparian scrub (incl.desert washes) | ||
Woodland | cismontane woodland | |
piñon and juniper woodland | ||
Sonoran thorn woodland | ||
Forest | broadleaved upland forest | D, < 5% |
North Coast coniferous forest | ||
closed cone coniferous forest | ||
lower montane coniferous forest | ||
upper montane coniferous forest | ||
subalpine coniferous forest | ||
Alpine Habitats | alpine boulder and rock field | |
alpine dwarf scrub | ||
Amplitude (breadth): | B | |
Distribution (highest score): | D |
Infested Jepson Regions
Click here for a map of Jepson regions
- Central West
- Great Valley
- Northwest
- Southwest