Plant Assessment Form
More Digitalis purpurea resources
Digitalis purpurea
Common Names: foxglove
Evaluated on: 7/31/03
List committee review date: 01/08/2003
Re-evaluation date:
Evaluator(s)
California Dept. of Parks and Recreation; CalEPPC
P. O. Box 603, Little River, CA 95456-0603
(707) 937-9176; (707) 937-2278
pwarner@mcn.org
List committee members
Jake SiggPeter Warner
Joe DiTomaso
Doug Johnson
Brianna Richardson
General Comments
No general comments for this species
Table 2. Criteria, Section, and Overall Scores
Overall Score?
Limited
|
Alert Status?
No Alert
|
Documentation?
2.5 out of 5
|
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | Documentation | |||
1.1 | ?Impact on abiotic ecosystem processes | U. Unknown | Reviewed Scientific Publication | |
1.2 | ?Impact on plant community | C. Minor | Observational | |
1.3 | ?Impact on higher trophic levels | C. Minor | Observational | |
1.4 | ?Impact on genetic integrity | D. None | Other Published Material | |
2.1 | ?Role of anthropogenic and natural disturbance in establishment | B. Moderate | Observational | |
2.2 | ?Local rate of spread with no management | B. Increases less rapidly | Observational | |
2.3 | ?Recent trend in total area infested within state | C. Stable | Observational | |
2.4 |
?Innate reproductive potential (see Worksheet A) |
A. High | ||
2.5 | ?Potential for human-caused dispersal | A. High | Other Published Material | |
2.6 | ? Potential for natural long-distance dispersal | C. Rare | Other Published Material | |
2.7 | ?Other regions invaded | B. Invades 1 or 2 ecological types | Other Published Material | |
3.1 |
?Ecological amplitude/Range (see Worksheet C) |
A. Widespread | Other Published Material | |
3.2 |
?Distribution/Peak frequency (see Worksheet C) |
C. Low | Observational |
Table 3. Documentation
Scores are explained in the "Criteria for Categorizing Invasive Non-Native Plants that Threaten Wildlands".
Section 1: Impact | |
---|---|
Question 1.1 Impact on abiotic ecosystem processes? | U Reviewed Scientific Publication |
Identify ecosystem processes impacted: None known Sources of information: |
|
Question 1.2 Impact on plant community composition, structure, and interactions? |
C Observational |
Identify type of impact or alteration: change in community composition; displacement of native species observed Sources of information: Peter Warner (personal observation); Joe DiTomaso (personal observation) |
|
Question 1.3 Impact on higher trophic levels? | C Observational |
Identify type of impact or alteration: potential for wildlife poisoning (1) _ have generalist herbivores learned to avoid? Observations suggest plants are not browsed (2) inferred from toxicity of plant; reports on domestic animal injuries, deaths Sources of information: |
|
Question 1.4 Impact on genetic integrity? | D Other Published Material |
None known; probability remote due to lack of closely related native species inferred from lack of closely related species native to California Sources of information: Hickman, JC, et al. 1993. The Jepson Manual: Higher Vascular Plants of California |
|
Section 2: Invasiveness | |
Question 2.1 Role of anthropogenic and natural disturbance in establishment? |
B Observational |
Describe role of disturbance: little, if any, disturbance necessary for establishment; grows in shaded to open, damp forests inferred from conditions where plants have become established (observations) Sources of information: Peter Warner (personal observation) |
|
Question 2.2 Local rate of spread with no management? | B Observational |
Describe rate of spread: Does not appear to spread rapidly; plants do not generally establish in dense populations based on observations of infestations Sources of information: Peter Warner (personal observation) |
|
Question 2.3 Recent trend in total area infested within state? | C Observational |
Describe trend: probably slowly increasing, due to seed dispersal by birds; species has probably been widely dispersed for a long time (100+ years) observational; inference Sources of information: Peter Warner (personal observations) |
|
Question 2.4 Innate reproductive potential? | A |
Describe key reproductive characteristics: abundant production of small seeds (many per flower, many flowers/plant) written information; inference Sources of information: Hickman, JC, et al. 1993. The Jepson Manual: Higher Vascular Plants of California; |
|
Question 2.5 Potential for human-caused dispersal? | A Other Published Material |
Identify dispersal mechanisms: plants widely used horticulturally; seeds dispersed on clothing, footwear, etc. written information; deductive reasoning based on observations of infested areas Sources of information: DiTomaso, J (unpublished data); |
|
Question 2.6 Potential for natural long-distance dispersal? | C Other Published Material |
Identify dispersal mechanisms: wind, water, mud clinging to animal hooves & feet (1); often observed spreading along trails in damp areas (2) written information Sources of information: 1. DiTomaso, J (unpublished data) |
|
Question 2.7 Other regions invaded? | B Other Published Material |
Identify other regions: widespread in cool, moist areas of the North American west; northeast U. S. published information; observations Sources of information: Hickman, JC, et al. 1993. The Jepson Manual: Higher Vascular Plants of California; |
|
Section 3: Distribution | |
Question 3.1 Ecological amplitude/Range? | A Other Published Material |
common in cool, coastal forests, woodlands, scrub of Pacific Northwest; unknown types of habitats in Sierra Nevada, Cascades, Klamath Mtns.; probably introduced early in Euro-American settlement areas of the West observations; inference based on horticultural popularity, long-term medicinal use of plant Sources of information: Warner, PJ. 2002-2005. Personal observations, Mendocino Co. 707/937-1976 corylus@earthlink.net |
|
Question 3.2 Distribution/Peak frequency? | C Observational |
Describe distribution: common but sporadic in suitable habitat (1,2,3); not observed in a high proportion of vulnerable habitat types, but common within those invaded (1). extrapolation from local observations Sources of information: 1. Warner, PJ. 2002-2005. Personal observations, Mendocino Co. 707/937-1976 corylus@earthlink.net |
Worksheet A - Innate reproductive potential
Reaches reproductive maturity in 2 years or less | Yes |
Dense infestations produce >1,000 viable seed per square meter | Yes |
Populations of this species produce seeds every year. | Yes |
Seed production sustained over 3 or more months within a population annually | No |
Seeds remain viable in soil for three or more years | Yes |
Viable seed produced with both self-pollination and cross-pollination | Yes |
Has quickly spreading vegetative structures (rhizomes, roots, etc.) that may root at nodes | No |
Fragments easily and fragments can become established elsewhere | No |
Resprouts readily when cut, grazed, or burned | No |
Total points: | 7 |
Total unknowns: | 0 |
Total score: | A? |
Related traits:
Worksheet B - Arizona Ecological Types is not included here
Worksheet C - California Ecological Types
(sensu Holland 1986)Major Ecological Types | Minor Ecological Types | Code? |
---|---|---|
Marine Systems | marine systems | |
Freshwater and Estuarine | lakes, ponds, reservoirs | |
Aquatic Systems | rivers, streams, canals | |
estuaries | ||
Dunes | coastal | |
desert | ||
interior | ||
Scrub and Chaparral | coastal bluff scrub | |
coastal scrub | D, < 5% | |
Sonoran desert scrub | ||
Mojavean desert scrub (incl. Joshua tree woodland) | ||
Great Basin scrub | ||
chenopod scrub | ||
montane dwarf scrub | ||
Upper Sonoran subshrub scrub | ||
chaparral | D, < 5% | |
Grasslands, Vernal Pools, Meadows, and other Herb Communities | coastal prairie | |
valley and foothill grassland | ||
Great Basin grassland | ||
vernal pool | D, < 5% | |
meadow and seep | ||
alkali playa | ||
pebble plain | D, < 5% | |
Bog and Marsh | bog and fen | D, < 5% |
marsh and swamp | D, < 5% | |
Riparian and Bottomland habitat | riparian forest | D, < 5% |
riparian woodland | ||
riparian scrub (incl.desert washes) | ||
Woodland | cismontane woodland | |
piñon and juniper woodland | ||
Sonoran thorn woodland | ||
Forest | broadleaved upland forest | C, 5% - 20% |
North Coast coniferous forest | ||
closed cone coniferous forest | ||
lower montane coniferous forest | ||
upper montane coniferous forest | ||
subalpine coniferous forest | ||
Alpine Habitats | alpine boulder and rock field | |
alpine dwarf scrub | ||
Amplitude (breadth): | A | |
Distribution (highest score): | C |
Infested Jepson Regions
Click here for a map of Jepson regions
- Cascade Range
- Central West
- Great Valley
- Northwest
- Sierra Nevada
- Southwest