Plant Assessment Form
More Conium maculatum resources
Conium maculatum
Common Names: poison-hemlock
Evaluated on: 5/22/03
List committee review date: 06/06/2003
Re-evaluation date:
Evaluator(s)
UC Davis
Weed Science Program, Robbins Hall, Univ. California, Davis CA 95616
530-754-8715
DiTomaso@vegmail.ucdavis.edu
List committee members
Joe DiTomasoPeter Warner
Alison Stanton
Carla Bossard
Cynthia Roye
Jake Sigg
Doug Johnson
Brianna Richardson
General Comments
No general comments for this species
Table 2. Criteria, Section, and Overall Scores
Overall Score?
Moderate
|
Alert Status?
No Alert
|
Documentation?
3 out of 5
|
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | Documentation | |||
1.1 | ?Impact on abiotic ecosystem processes | U. Unknown | Reviewed Scientific Publication | |
1.2 | ?Impact on plant community | B. Moderate | Other Published Material | |
1.3 | ?Impact on higher trophic levels | A. Severe | Other Published Material | |
1.4 | ?Impact on genetic integrity | D. None | Other Published Material | |
2.1 | ?Role of anthropogenic and natural disturbance in establishment | B. Moderate | Other Published Material | |
2.2 | ?Local rate of spread with no management | B. Increases less rapidly | Other Published Material | |
2.3 | ?Recent trend in total area infested within state | C. Stable | Observational | |
2.4 |
?Innate reproductive potential (see Worksheet A) |
A. High | Reviewed Scientific Publication | |
2.5 | ?Potential for human-caused dispersal | C. Low | Other Published Material | |
2.6 | ? Potential for natural long-distance dispersal | B. Occasional | Other Published Material | |
2.7 | ?Other regions invaded | C. Already invaded | Other Published Material | |
3.1 |
?Ecological amplitude/Range (see Worksheet C) |
A. Widespread | Other Published Material | |
3.2 |
?Distribution/Peak frequency (see Worksheet C) |
C. Low | Other Published Material |
Table 3. Documentation
Scores are explained in the "Criteria for Categorizing Invasive Non-Native Plants that Threaten Wildlands".
Section 1: Impact | |
---|---|
Question 1.1 Impact on abiotic ecosystem processes? | U Reviewed Scientific Publication |
Identify ecosystem processes impacted: None reported, unknown. Sources of information: |
|
Question 1.2 Impact on plant community composition, structure, and interactions? |
B Other Published Material |
Identify type of impact or alteration: Can form very dense stands and crowd out other vegetation. Pioneer species colonizing disturbed sties and displacing natives during early successional stages. Suppresses light. Sources of information: |
|
Question 1.3 Impact on higher trophic levels? | A Other Published Material |
Identify type of impact or alteration: Toxic to all organisms including humans, livestock, and wildlife. 10% of elk population on Grizzly Island, CA, died from ingestion of poison hemlock in 1985. Sources of information: Mitich, L.W. 1998. Weed Technology 12:194-197; Pitcher, D. 1989. Poison hemlock. Element Stewardship Abstract. TNC; Parsons, W.T. and E.G. Cuthbertson. 1992. Noxious Weeds of Australia. Inkata Press, Sydney; DiTomaso, J.M. and E.A. Healy. 2005. Weeds of California. DANR (pre-print) |
|
Question 1.4 Impact on genetic integrity? | D Other Published Material |
None No native Conium species in North America Sources of information: DiTomaso, J.M. 1999. Poison hemlock. In, Biology and Management of Noxious Rangeland Weeds. Oregon St. Univ. Press, Corvallis. |
|
Section 2: Invasiveness | |
Question 2.1 Role of anthropogenic and natural disturbance in establishment? |
B Other Published Material |
Describe role of disturbance: Usually found in disturbed sites, but can invade native plant communities in riparian woodlands and open flood plains of rivers and streams. Common in shady areas Sources of information: DiTomaso, J.M. and E.A. Healy. 2005. Weeds of California. DANR (pre-print); Pitcher, D. 1989. Poison hemlock. Element Stewardship Abstract. TNC |
|
Question 2.2 Local rate of spread with no management? | B Other Published Material |
Describe rate of spread: Spreads rapidly in newly disturbed sites. Probably > 10 years. Sources of information: DiTomaso, J.M. 1999. Poison hemlock. In, Biology and Management of Noxious Rangeland Weeds. Oregon St. Univ. Press, Corvallis. |
|
Question 2.3 Recent trend in total area infested within state? | C Observational |
Describe trend: Appears to be stable statewide. Has been around for many years. Sources of information: DiTomaso-Observational |
|
Question 2.4 Innate reproductive potential? | A Reviewed Scientific Publication |
Describe key reproductive characteristics: Seed dispersal from late summer through winter. Dormancy about 3 years. Biennial, flowers in second year. Sources of information: Baskin, J.M. and C.C. Baskin. 1990. Seed germination ecology of poison-hemlock. Canadian J. Bot. 68:2018-2024; DiTomaso, J.M. and E.A. Healy. 2005. Weeds of California. DANR (pre-print); DiTomaso, J.M. 1999. Poison hemlock. In, Biology and Management of Noxious Rangeland Weeds. Oregon St. Univ. Press, Corvallis. |
|
Question 2.5 Potential for human-caused dispersal? | C Other Published Material |
Identify dispersal mechanisms: Can be moved by farm machinery, vehicles, ag practices, clothing, etc., but this is usually from agricultural area to agricultural area. Sources of information: Pitcher, D. 1989. Poison hemlock. Element Stewardship Abstract. TNC |
|
Question 2.6 Potential for natural long-distance dispersal? | B Other Published Material |
Identify dispersal mechanisms: Most seed fall to base of parent plant. Some long distance movement in water when plants are growing near streams. Sources of information: DiTomaso, J.M. and E.A. Healy. 2005. Weeds of California. DANR (pre-print); DiTomaso, J.M. 1999. Poison hemlock. In, Biology and Management of Noxious Rangeland Weeds. Oregon St. Univ. Press, Corvallis. |
|
Question 2.7 Other regions invaded? | C Other Published Material |
Identify other regions: Reported as a weed in South America, Europe, temperate Asia, North Africa, Australia, New Zealand and Canada. Also throughout the US. A weed in 9 crops in 34 contries. Widespread worldwide but in the same type of habitats. Sources of information: |
|
Section 3: Distribution | |
Question 3.1 Ecological amplitude/Range? | A Other Published Material |
Considered a facultative wetland indicator plant in the western US and an obligate wetland species in AZ and NM. Riparian areas, ditches, pastures, waste places. Introduced to the US as a garden plant in 1800s. First reported in California in 1893 in Berkeley. Sources of information: DiTomaso, J.M. and E.A. Healy. 2005. Weeds of California. DANR (pre-print); Drewitz, J. 2000. Conium maculatum. In, Invasive Plants of Californias Wildlands. CalEPPC. UC Press, Berkeley. |
|
Question 3.2 Distribution/Peak frequency? | C Other Published Material |
Describe distribution: Common in shady areas, particularly riparian woodlands and open flood plains of rivers and streams. Sources of information: Pitcher, D. 1989. Poison hemlock. Element Stewardship Abstract. TNC |
Worksheet A - Innate reproductive potential
Reaches reproductive maturity in 2 years or less | Yes |
Dense infestations produce >1,000 viable seed per square meter | Yes |
Populations of this species produce seeds every year. | Yes |
Seed production sustained over 3 or more months within a population annually | Yes |
Seeds remain viable in soil for three or more years | Yes |
Viable seed produced with both self-pollination and cross-pollination | Yes |
Has quickly spreading vegetative structures (rhizomes, roots, etc.) that may root at nodes | No |
Fragments easily and fragments can become established elsewhere | No |
Resprouts readily when cut, grazed, or burned | No |
Total points: | 8 |
Total unknowns: | 0 |
Total score: | A? |
Related traits:
Worksheet B - Arizona Ecological Types is not included here
Worksheet C - California Ecological Types
(sensu Holland 1986)Major Ecological Types | Minor Ecological Types | Code? |
---|---|---|
Marine Systems | marine systems | |
Freshwater and Estuarine | lakes, ponds, reservoirs | |
Aquatic Systems | rivers, streams, canals | |
estuaries | ||
Dunes | coastal | |
desert | ||
interior | ||
Scrub and Chaparral | coastal bluff scrub | |
coastal scrub | ||
Sonoran desert scrub | ||
Mojavean desert scrub (incl. Joshua tree woodland) | ||
Great Basin scrub | ||
chenopod scrub | ||
montane dwarf scrub | ||
Upper Sonoran subshrub scrub | ||
chaparral | D, < 5% | |
Grasslands, Vernal Pools, Meadows, and other Herb Communities | coastal prairie | D, < 5% |
valley and foothill grassland | ||
Great Basin grassland | ||
vernal pool | D, < 5% | |
meadow and seep | ||
alkali playa | ||
pebble plain | ||
Bog and Marsh | bog and fen | |
marsh and swamp | D, < 5% | |
Riparian and Bottomland habitat | riparian forest | C, 5% - 20% |
riparian woodland | D, < 5% | |
riparian scrub (incl.desert washes) | ||
Woodland | cismontane woodland | |
piñon and juniper woodland | ||
Sonoran thorn woodland | ||
Forest | broadleaved upland forest | |
North Coast coniferous forest | ||
closed cone coniferous forest | ||
lower montane coniferous forest | ||
upper montane coniferous forest | ||
subalpine coniferous forest | ||
Alpine Habitats | alpine boulder and rock field | |
alpine dwarf scrub | ||
Amplitude (breadth): | A | |
Distribution (highest score): | C |
Infested Jepson Regions
Click here for a map of Jepson regions
- CA Floristic Province
- Cascade Range
- Central West
- Great Valley
- Northwest
- Sierra Nevada
- Southwest
- Modoc Plateau
- Sierra Nevada East
- Desert Province
- Mojave Desert
- Sonoran Desert