Plant Assessment Form

Alliaria petiolata

Synonyms: Alliaria alliaria, Alliaria officinalis, Erysimum alliaria, Sisymbrium alliaria

Common Names: garlic mustard, hedge garlic, Jack-by-the-edge

Evaluated on: 9/1/2022

List committee review date: 09/03/2022

Re-evaluation date:

Evaluator(s)

Chris McDonald
University of California, Dept. of Agriculture and Natural Resources
cjmcdonald@ucanr.edu

List committee members

Jutta Burger
Jason Giessow
Scott Oneto
Marla Knight
Alex Simmons
Katherine Brafford
Lauren Quon
Nikki Valentine

General Comments

Minor updates made 11/1/2023 to incorporate second population found in northern CA. - J. Burger

Table 2. Criteria, Section, and Overall Scores

Overall Score? Moderate
Alert Status? Alert
Documentation? 3.5 out of 5
Score Documentation
1.1 ?Impact on abiotic ecosystem processes B. Moderate Reviewed Scientific Publication
Impact?
Four-part score BABD Total Score
B
1.2 ?Impact on plant community A. Severe Reviewed Scientific Publication
1.3 ?Impact on higher trophic levels B. Moderate Reviewed Scientific Publication
1.4 ?Impact on genetic integrity D. None Other Published Material
2.1 ?Role of anthropogenic and natural disturbance in establishment A. Severe Reviewed Scientific Publication
Invasiveness?
Total Points
20 Total Score A
2.2 ?Local rate of spread with no management A. Increases rapidly Reviewed Scientific Publication
2.3 ?Recent trend in total area infested within state A. Increasing rapidly Observational
2.4 ?Innate reproductive potential
(see Worksheet A)
A. High Reviewed Scientific Publication
2.5 ?Potential for human-caused dispersal A. High Reviewed Scientific Publication
2.6 ? Potential for natural long-distance dispersal B. Occasional Reviewed Scientific Publication
2.7 ?Other regions invaded A. Invades 3 or more ecological types Reviewed Scientific Publication
3.1 ?Ecological amplitude/Range
(see Worksheet C)
C. Limited Other Published Material
Distribution?
Total Score C
3.2 ?Distribution/Peak frequency
(see Worksheet C)
D. Very low Observational

Table 3. Documentation

Scores are explained in the "Criteria for Categorizing Invasive Non-Native Plants that Threaten Wildlands".

Section 1: Impact
Question 1.1 Impact on abiotic ecosystem processes? B Reviewed Scientific Publication
Identify ecosystem processes impacted:

Reduces light and available space in forest understory. Also changes nutrients in the soil, accelerating the decay of leaves and nutrients (Anderson 2012, Rodgers 2008). Forms dense infestations in invaded range (Anderson 2012) including Southern California where native plants are less dense (see CalFlora pictures).


Sources of information:

Anderson, 2012. Stinson et al. 2007. Rodgers et al. 2008a. CalFlora.


Question 1.2 Impact on plant community composition,
structure, and interactions?
A Reviewed Scientific Publication
Identify type of impact or alteration:

Reduces the diversity of native plants in forest understory including native annuals, vines and tree seedlings (Rodgers et al. 2008b). Plants are allopathic and reduce germination and establishment of neighboring native species (Cipollini 2016). Also reduces the soil mycorrhizal associations with native tree seedlings (Rodgers et al. 2008). In Southern California plants are regularly 4 ft. tall at maturity and can form patches greater than 75% cover (C. McDonald pers. obs., 2022)


Sources of information:

Rodgers et al., 2008b. Cipollini 2016.


Question 1.3 Impact on higher trophic levels? B Reviewed Scientific Publication
Identify type of impact or alteration:

Garlic mustard in the eastern US is known to affect pollinators. Several butterfly species have been known to oviposit on garlic mustard however their young do not successfully complete their life cycle on garlic mustard (Renwick et al. 2001, Rodgers et al. 2008). It is likely that as populations of garlic mustard increase host plants will become unavailable to native pollinators in the forest understory where garlic mustard invades (Keeler et al. 2006).


Sources of information:

Keeler et al., 2006., Renwick et al., 2001. Rodgers et al., 2008.


Question 1.4 Impact on genetic integrity? D Other Published Material

There are no other species in the Alliaria genus in the US (Flora of North America 2022). There are numerous other mustard species in California, it is unknown, but not very likely, for potential hybridization.


Sources of information:

Flora of North America 2022


Section 2: Invasiveness
Question 2.1 Role of anthropogenic and natural disturbance
in establishment?
A Reviewed Scientific Publication
Describe role of disturbance:

Garlic mustard spreads easily in disturbed and undisturbed environments with or without anthropogenic factors (Anderson 2012). In Southern California it is spreading in undisturbed riparian forest habitat. There are reports of garlic mustard invading horticultural landscapes as well as roadsides (Landis and Evans)


Sources of information:

Anderson, 2012.


Question 2.2 Local rate of spread with no management? A Reviewed Scientific Publication
Describe rate of spread:

It can become the dominant understory forest plant in 5-7 years (Anderson 2012). It has quickly spread across the eastern US spreading 6,400 km^2 per year (Rodgers et al. 2008b). A year after having been found for the first time in California, it was mapped along 2.5 miles of streamside habitat in Southern California growing in dense patches along and near the stream (C. McDonald pers. obs.).


Sources of information:

Anderson, 2012. Rodgers et al., 2008b.


Question 2.3 Recent trend in total area infested within state? A Observational
Describe trend:

Garlic mustard was first discovered in Southern California in 2020 in Hook Creek. It is unknown when it first arrived there. The infestation is dense in places, with numerous small patches growing in suitable habitat along a 2.5 mile stretch of the creek. In areas where the creek is flat, the patches are large, extend 20-30 feet from the stream's edge, and contain thousands and thousands of plants. Published accounts from other areas suggest garlic mustard spreads rapidly (Rodgers et al. 2008b), and in Hook Creek plants are vigorous with copious amounts of seed. There is no evidence to suggest it does not spread rapidly in Southern California; all current evidence suggests it does spread rapidly. More recently, a separate population has been found along Rush Creek in Trinity County, likely originating on private land and extending into National Forest property.


Sources of information:

Rodgers et al. 2008b


Question 2.4 Innate reproductive potential? A Reviewed Scientific Publication
Describe key reproductive characteristics:

Plants are capable of producing a high number of seeds (up to 7900 per large plant in the eastern USA; Nuzzo, 1993) and have some dormancy, and create a soil seed bank (Rodgers et al. 2008b). Plants are capable of producing viable seeds both through self pollination and cross pollination (Sabin and Polanin 2013).


Sources of information:

Rodgers et al., 2008b. Nuzzo, 1993. Sabin and Polanin, 2013.


Question 2.5 Potential for human-caused dispersal? A Reviewed Scientific Publication
Identify dispersal mechanisms:

People and anthropogenic disturbances seem to be one of the main pathways for garlic mustard to disperse both over medium distances and long distances (Anderson 2012, Rodgers et al. 2008b). Main sources of long-distance dispersal include accidental transport on contaminated tools, clothes and footwear. The seeds in Southern California are readily moving downstream to new habitats, as evidenced by the establishment of numerous small garlic mustard patches (C. McDonald pers. obv., Calflora 2022). The only two known naturalized populations of garlic mustard are hundred of miles apart and themselves isolated by hundreds of miles to the next wild out-of-state populations in Oregon and Utah (iNaturalist). Most seeds fall close to the parent plant (Anderson 2012). Since the fruits are 3-5 feet high the seeds are easily picked up on equipment, the clothes of hikers, and, possibly, wildlife.


Sources of information:

Anderson, 2012. Rodgers et al., 2008b. C. McDonald pers. obv. Calflora, 2022.


Question 2.6 Potential for natural long-distance dispersal? B Reviewed Scientific Publication
Identify dispersal mechanisms:

Garlic mustards seeds seem able to float, with some variation around being able to float well or poorly (Cavers et al. 1979). In Southern California garlic mustard seeds have spread down stream in Hook Creek, where the higher elevations of the infestation are near houses, the lower half is in relatively undisturbed riparian forest. Most seeds fall near the parent plant (Anderson 2012). However seeds appear to stick to damp surfaces or clothes and fur (Cavers et al. 1979, Rodgers et al. 2008b, Loebach and Anderson, 2018). Longer-distance dispersal via water, equipment, or clothing is likely given its distribution along waterways and trials, but has not been explicitly tested or confirmed yet.


Sources of information:

Cavers et al., 1979. Loebach and Anderson, 2018. Rodgers et al., 2008b.


Question 2.7 Other regions invaded? A Reviewed Scientific Publication
Identify other regions:

It grows in the forest understory in the eastern US and Canada as well as roadsides, disturbed areas and trails in mesic and riparian areas (Rodgers et al 2008, Anderson 2012, Landis and Evans).


Sources of information:

Note: I had trouble scoring this question. The directions were specifically for similar communities in other states that also occur in California. My knowledge of forest types in the eastern US and pacific northwest is lacking.


Section 3: Distribution
Question 3.1 Ecological amplitude/Range? C Other Published Material

Currently growing in riparian forest in Southern California. Other recent iNaturalist sightings suggest it can grow in several habitat types in California and in other western US states (but not AZ, NV or NM as indicated in directions).


Sources of information:

Note: another difficult question for me to score, given my lack of knowledge in other forests.


Question 3.2 Distribution/Peak frequency? D Observational
Describe distribution:

Only grows in small (several square feet) to medium sized patches (less than 1ac.) adjacent to riparian areas in Southern California. Grows only where soils are sufficiently saturated.


Sources of information:

Worksheet A - Innate reproductive potential

Reaches reproductive maturity in 2 years or less Yes
Dense infestations produce >1,000 viable seed per square meter Yes
Populations of this species produce seeds every year. Yes
Seed production sustained over 3 or more months within a population annually No
Seeds remain viable in soil for three or more years Yes
Viable seed produced with both self-pollination and cross-pollination Yes
Has quickly spreading vegetative structures (rhizomes, roots, etc.) that may root at nodes No
Fragments easily and fragments can become established elsewhere No
Resprouts readily when cut, grazed, or burned Yes
Total points: 8
Total unknowns: 0
Total score: A?

Related traits:

Worksheet B - Arizona Ecological Types is not included here

Worksheet C - California Ecological Types

(sensu Holland 1986)
Major Ecological Types Minor Ecological Types Code?
Marine Systemsmarine systemsU, Unknown
Freshwater and Estuarine lakes, ponds, reservoirsU, Unknown
Aquatic Systemsrivers, streams, canalsU, Unknown
estuariesU, Unknown
DunescoastalU, Unknown
desertU, Unknown
interiorU, Unknown
Scrub and Chaparralcoastal bluff scrubU, Unknown
coastal scrubU, Unknown
Sonoran desert scrubU, Unknown
Mojavean desert scrub (incl. Joshua tree woodland)U, Unknown
Great Basin scrubU, Unknown
chenopod scrubU, Unknown
montane dwarf scrubU, Unknown
Upper Sonoran subshrub scrubU, Unknown
chaparralU, Unknown
Grasslands, Vernal Pools, Meadows, and other Herb Communitiescoastal prairieU, Unknown
valley and foothill grasslandU, Unknown
Great Basin grasslandU, Unknown
vernal poolU, Unknown
meadow and seepU, Unknown
alkali playaU, Unknown
pebble plainU, Unknown
Bog and Marshbog and fenU, Unknown
marsh and swampU, Unknown
Riparian and Bottomland habitatriparian forestD, < 5%
riparian woodlandD, < 5%
riparian scrub (incl.desert washes)U, Unknown
Woodlandcismontane woodlandU, Unknown
piñon and juniper woodlandU, Unknown
Sonoran thorn woodlandU, Unknown
Forestbroadleaved upland forestU, Unknown
North Coast coniferous forestU, Unknown
closed cone coniferous forestU, Unknown
lower montane coniferous forestU, Unknown
upper montane coniferous forestU, Unknown
subalpine coniferous forestU, Unknown
Alpine Habitatsalpine boulder and rock fieldU, Unknown
alpine dwarf scrubU, Unknown
Amplitude (breadth): C
Distribution (highest score): D

Infested Jepson Regions

Click here for a map of Jepson regions

  • Northwest
  • Southwest